Use of Military Force in Syria by Turkey, NATO, and the United States
Jordan J. Paust
University of Houston Law Center
May 30, 2013
34 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 431 (2013)
U of Houston Law Center No. 2013-A-6
During an ongoing insurgency in Syria, Turkey has already used military force against Syrian military targets inside Syria. Was this use of force by Turkey permissible under international law? If NATO engages in similar military force or more extensive armed force as a regional organization, will NATO’s conduct be permissible under international law as part of collective self-defense or as a “regional action” under the Charter? U.S. military have been deployed to Jordan. If the United Sates engages in the use of force in Syria under certain future scenarios, especially (1) to destroy chemical and biological weapons and (2) to support the government of the legitimate representatives of the Syrian people, will such conduct be permissible under international law? These and related questions are explored in the essay.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: al Qaeda, armed attack, Arab Spring, Assad, belligerent, biological weapon, chemical weapon, collective self-defense, Kosovo, NATO, O.A.S., preemptive, regional action, self-defense, Syria, Turkey, U.N. Charter, use of force
Date posted: May 31, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds