Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2274694
 


 



Arbitration and the Future of Delaware's Corporate Law Franchise


Brian J. M. Quinn


BC Law School

January 5, 2013

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 14:829

Abstract:     
In response to perceived threats to its position as a venue for adjudication of corporate litigation, in 2010 Delaware added a unique arbitration procedure to its menu of options for parties seeking to resolve their corporate disputes in Delaware. This new procedure relies on sitting judges to act as arbitrators in confidential proceedings. In this paper, I argue that not only is such a procedure in violation of the First Amendment policy to access to the courts, by virtue of the fact that sitting judges, rather than retired judges or professional arbitrators hear the cases, but that it is also bad policy from the perspective of the corporate law. If successful, the procedure threatens to put Delaware's corporate law franchise at risk over the long term.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: corporate, arbitration, shareholder litigation

JEL Classification: K00, K22, J52

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 6, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Quinn, Brian J. M., Arbitration and the Future of Delaware's Corporate Law Franchise (January 5, 2013). Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 14:829 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2274694

Contact Information

Brian J. M. Quinn (Contact Author)
BC Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 228
Downloads: 39

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 1.110 seconds