The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities Fraud

Wendy Gerwick Couture

University of Idaho College of Law

June 6, 2013

Alabama Law Review, Vol. 65, p. 903, 2014

This Article seeks to correct the imbalance that occurs when the First Amendment and securities fraud collide. Under current precedent, securities analysts, credit rating agencies, and financial journalists are subject to differing liability standards; depending on whether they are sued for defamation or for securities fraud. Under New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 279-80 (1964), First Amendment protections apply in the defamation context in order to prevent the chilling of valuable speech, yet courts have declined to extend these protections to the securities fraud context. This imbalance threatens to chill valuable speech about public companies. To prevent the dangerous chilling effect of potential securities fraud liability, this Article contends that the New York Times protections should apply equally in securities fraud cases. Therefore, under this Article’s recommendation, a securities fraud claim asserted against a non-commercial speaker for speech concerning a public company cannot prevail absent a showing of actual malice, by clear and convincing evidence, and subject to independent appellate review.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 72

Keywords: securities regulation, securities litigation, securities fraud, First Amendment, defamation

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 7, 2013 ; Last revised: April 28, 2014

Suggested Citation

Couture, Wendy Gerwick, The Collision Between the First Amendment and Securities Fraud (June 6, 2013). Alabama Law Review, Vol. 65, p. 903, 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2275492

Contact Information

Wendy Gerwick Couture (Contact Author)
University of Idaho College of Law ( email )
PO Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0051
United States
208-364-4547 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.uidaho.edu/law/people/faculty/wgcouture
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 366
Downloads: 90
Download Rank: 195,698
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.390 seconds