Do Retroactive Rebates Imply Lower Prices for Consumers?
Frank P. Maier-Rigaud
IESEG School of Management (LEM-CNRS), Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods; NERA Economic Consulting
University of Hohenheim
June 8, 2013
Despite a host of recent cases on both sides of the Atlantic, the antitrust implications of retroactive rebates or loyalty discounts are among the most controversial topics in competition law. One of the key beliefs found in the literature is that such schemes lead to lower prices for consumers and that competition authorities therefore need to be particularly prudent in balancing these "obvious" pro-competitive effects against potential foreclosure concerns. Based on a simple model it is shown that retroactive rebates do not necessarily imply lower prices for consumers and that, on the contrary, even total welfare may decline as a result of the introduction of a rebate scheme. In addition to leading to higher prices, rebate schemes may hurt consumers by inducing them to buy a higher quantity than they otherwise would. The belief that rebates increase consumer welfare as they imply lower prices is shown to be based on the fundamentally flawed reliance on the non-rebated base price as appropriate counterfactual.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31
Keywords: antitrust, competition, loyalty discounts, loyalty rebates, retroactive rebates, consumer welfare, producer welfare, competition policy
JEL Classification: D42, K21, L12, L42working papers series
Date posted: June 10, 2013 ; Last revised: July 22, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.751 seconds