Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=227644
 
 

Footnotes (116)



 


 



The Cartagena Protocol and Biological Diversity: Biosafe or Bio-Sorry?


Jonathan H. Adler


Case Western Reserve University School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center


Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 12, 2000

Abstract:     
In January 2000, delegates from over 100 nations completed negotiations on an international treaty for the regulation of biotechnology, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The stated purpose of this protocol is to enhance the protection of biological diversity. Despite its good intentions, there is a mismatch between the protocol?s substantive provisions and present threats to biological diversity. The protocol endorses "precautionary" regulation of transboundary shipments of genetically engineered organisms, including crops, so as to reduce the environmental risks that such organisms may pose. The greatest threat to biological diversity is habitat loss, largely driven by the conversion of land for agricultural uses. Genetically engineered crops could alleviate pressures to clear habitat by increasing per-acre agricultural productivity. Therefore, insofar as the biosafety protocol discourages the use of genetically engineered crops, it could do more harm than good.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 9, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Adler, Jonathan H., The Cartagena Protocol and Biological Diversity: Biosafe or Bio-Sorry?. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 12, 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=227644 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.227644

Contact Information

Jonathan H. Adler (Contact Author)
Case Western Reserve University School of Law ( email )
11075 East Boulevard
Cleveland, OH 44106-7148
United States
216-368-2535 (Phone)
216-368-2086 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.jhadler.net
PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
2048 Analysis Drive
Suite A
Bozeman, MT 59718
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,538
Downloads: 253
Download Rank: 67,929
Footnotes:  116

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.235 seconds