Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2277094
 


 



The Right to Plea Bargain With Competent Counsel After Cooper and Frye: Is the Supreme Court Making the Ordinary Criminal Process 'Too Long, Too Expensive, and Unpredictable...In Pursuit of Perfect Justice'?


Bruce A. Green


Fordham University School of Law

June 10, 2013

Duquesne University Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 735, 2013
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2277094

Abstract:     
In Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, the Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of criminal defendants who were deprived of a favorable plea offer because of their lawyers’ professional lapses. In dissent, Justice Scalia complained that “[t]he ordinary criminal process has become too long, too expensive, and unpredictable,” because of the Court’s criminal procedure jurisprudence; that plea bargaining is “the alternative in which...defendants have sought relief,” and that the two new decisions on the Sixth Amendment right to effective representation in plea bargaining would add to the burden on the criminal process. This essay examines several aspects of Justice Scalia’s complaint. First, it challenges Justice Scalia’s assumption that defendants take refuge in plea bargaining as an alternative to criminal trials because of the intricacies of constitutional criminal procedures. On the contrary, guilty pleas have become the ordinary means of resolving criminal cases, and defendants’ waivers of other constitutional rights have also become increasingly common, not because the Court is procedurally too demanding but because it has been under-protective; its decisions have constructed a system of waivers in which prosecutors may use harsh punishment as leverage to compel defendants to forgo procedural protections. Second, this essay raises doubts as to whether the two decisions to which Justice Scalia dissented either impose or invite new procedural burdens. Finally, this essay questions Justice Scalia’s premise that constitutional decisions in general burden the criminal process, and also questions the Justice’s attempt to support this premise by citing a 1965 article by Judge Henry Friendly, who did not disparage procedural protections in criminal cases, but asserted that constitutional decision-making should leave room for state legislative innovation in this field.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: plea bargaining, effective assistance of counsel, Justice Scalia, criminal procedure

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 11, 2013 ; Last revised: June 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Green, Bruce A., The Right to Plea Bargain With Competent Counsel After Cooper and Frye: Is the Supreme Court Making the Ordinary Criminal Process 'Too Long, Too Expensive, and Unpredictable...In Pursuit of Perfect Justice'? (June 10, 2013). Duquesne University Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 735, 2013; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2277094. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2277094

Contact Information

Bruce A. Green (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-6851 (Phone)
212-636-6899 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 347
Downloads: 62
Download Rank: 208,629

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds