Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2277258
 


 



Dispute System Design: A Comparative Study of India, Israel, and California


Sheila Purcell


University of California Hastings College of the Law

2013

UC Hastings Research Paper No. 48

Abstract:     
Alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") is practiced around the world with myriad approaches, though not without common ground. In an increasingly interconnected world, the sharing of this knowledge and experience has become a natural and even necessary step in the evolution of ADR. This Article compares the experience of three diverse court systems at different stages of ADR program development in Delhi, India; Tel Aviv, Israel; and San Mateo County, California. The first section briefly describes the origins of each court-annexed mediation program. The second section sets out a framework for analysis and then compares the three systems according to these analytic elements. This Article conlcudes with some observations on cross-cutting themes and trends for the future.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 11, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Purcell, Sheila, Dispute System Design: A Comparative Study of India, Israel, and California (2013). UC Hastings Research Paper No. 48. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2277258 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277258

Contact Information

Sheila Purcell (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 215
Downloads: 53
Download Rank: 217,789

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds