Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2278716
 


 



Deadly Drones, Due Process, and the Fourth Amendment


William Funk


Lewis & Clark Law School

June 12, 2013

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 22
Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14/2013

Abstract:     
The use of drones to target individuals, especially American citizens, outside of the immediate zone of hostilities has been severely questioned in the media with assertions that it constitutes the executive acting as the prosecutor, the judge, the jury and the executioner without any of the protections afforded by constitutional law. A leaked “white paper” from the administration is the only unclassified legal justification for this practice. The “white paper” raises a number of legal issues. Among these are whether the President has the authority to order such killings, whether various criminal statutes or the executive order banning assassination would prohibit such operations, and whether the operations would violate international law. This article, however, only addresses the questions: whether, and if so how, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Fourth Amendment would constrain these operations.

The article begins by describing the operations in question and the procedures the administration has put in place to authorize them and relates the arguments contained in the “white paper” regarding the requirements of due process and the Fourth Amendment. The article then critically assesses those arguments and raises some additional ones. In short, the article concludes that it is doubtful that the Due Process Clause is the appropriate constitutional provision applicable to drone strikes, although, if it is applicable, the current procedure, at least as outlined in the “white paper,” is constitutionally doubtful. Rather, the article asserts that it is the Fourth Amendment that is the appropriate lens under which to view drone strikes, and here the administration’s justifications have greater strength but still lack a vital element to ensure the reliability of the determinations it makes. The article suggests that extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court’s jurisdiction to drone strikes would satisfy any Due Process or Fourth Amendment concerns, and the use of that court would neither impede the effectiveness of the drone program nor raise other constitutional concerns.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: due process, fourth amendment, drones, search and seizure, constitutional law

JEL Classification: N4

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 13, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Funk, William, Deadly Drones, Due Process, and the Fourth Amendment (June 12, 2013). William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 22; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14/2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2278716

Contact Information

William F. Funk (Contact Author)
Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )
10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219-7799
United States
503-768-6606 (Phone)
503-768-6671 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 542
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 150,124
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Drones and the International Rule of Law
By Rosa Brooks

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.282 seconds