Does it Pay to Invest in Art? A Selection-Corrected Returns Perspective
Arthur G. Korteweg
University of Southern California - Marshall School of Business
Universite du Luxembourg - School of Finance; Emory University - Goizueta Business School
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Economics (ESE)
October 15, 2013
This paper shows the importance of correcting for sample selection when investing in illiquid assets with endogenous trading. Using a large sample of 20,538 paintings that were sold repeatedly at auction between 1972 and 2010, we find that paintings with higher price appreciation are more likely to trade. This strongly biases estimates of returns. The selection-corrected average annual index return is 6.5 percent, down from 10 percent for traditional uncorrected repeat sales regressions, and Sharpe Ratios drop from 0.24 to 0.04. From a pure financial perspective, passive index investing in paintings is not a viable investment strategy once selection bias is accounted for. Our results have important implications for other illiquid asset classes that trade endogenously.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: Art investing, Selection bias, Portfolio allocation
JEL Classification: D44, G11, Z11working papers series
Date posted: June 17, 2013 ; Last revised: October 17, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.515 seconds