Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2280210
 


 



Constitutional Interpretation and the Discipline of History


Helen Irving


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

June 2013

Federal Law Review, Vol. 41, 2013, Forthcoming
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 13/41

Abstract:     
The use of history in constitutional interpretation is widespread. It is defended by scholars and practiced by judges, both in Australia and, in particular, the United States; it also attracts many critics. Originalism, (as this practice has come to be known), comes in many forms, but common to all is the assumption that the meaning of constitutional provisions is to be found in the past. What originalists and critics alike rarely consider is whether, and if so, how it is possible to know the relevant history. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to this fundamental methodological question: If history is to guide constitutional interpretation, how should the courts ‘do’ history? What are the disciplinary rules of research that should be followed if historical meaning is genuinely to be delivered?

This paper explores what conventional historians do, (and the fallacies and errors they attempt to avoid), and identifies some of the basic rules of historical methodology, an awareness of which is a precondition for any claim to interpret historically. It considers several alternative ways in which judges might approach the use of history methodologically, albeit without becoming historians. It neither defends nor contests originalism, but concludes that history should be used in constitutional interpretation only with great care and only rarely.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: constitutional interpretation, originalism, historical research

JEL Classification: K10, K30

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 17, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Irving, Helen, Constitutional Interpretation and the Discipline of History (June 2013). Federal Law Review, Vol. 41, 2013, Forthcoming ; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 13/41. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2280210

Contact Information

Helen Irving (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 434
Downloads: 141
Download Rank: 115,974

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds