Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2281910
 


 



Judgment Day for Fraud-on-the-Market?: Reflections on Amgen and the Second Coming of Halliburton


Donald C. Langevoort


Georgetown University Law Center

November 16, 2013

Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 13-058

Abstract:     
In November 2013, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the Halliburton litigation to reconsider, and perhaps overrule, its seminal decision in Basic Inc. v. Levinson. Basic legitimated the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance, making securities class actions for claims of false corporate publicity viable, and such cases have become the central mechanisms for private securities fraud litigation. This move came after last Term’s Amgen decision, where four justices signaled their doubts about Basic. This essay looks at the connection between Amgen and the continuing viability of fraud-on-the-market litigation. How Halliburton comes out will likely depend on how the Court views the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 — was there an implicit Congressional endorsement of fraud-on-the-market as part of a broader political bargain to make such class actions harder (but not impossible) to bring? My essay considers that question along with others that are raised in the effort to overturn Basic.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: securities fraud, class actions, private securities litigation

JEL Classification: K00, K20, K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 21, 2013 ; Last revised: November 19, 2013

Suggested Citation

Langevoort, Donald C., Judgment Day for Fraud-on-the-Market?: Reflections on Amgen and the Second Coming of Halliburton (November 16, 2013). Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 13-058. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2281910 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2281910

Contact Information

Donald C. Langevoort (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9832 (Phone)
202-662-9412 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 561
Downloads: 159
Download Rank: 104,513

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds