Plea-Bargaining Law after Lafler and Frye
Russell D. Covey
Georgia State University College of Law
Duquesne University Law Review, Vol. 51, 2013
Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-17
In dissenting opinions in Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye – two recent cases dealing with the application of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the plea bargaining process – Justice Scalia warned of the coming creation of a whole new field of constitutional criminal procedure: plea bargaining law. This symposium contribution assesses that prediction. It concludes that the Lafler and Frye cases do lay the groundwork for important, albeit incremental, expansion of constitutional protections to criminal defendants in the guilty plea process. In particular, it urges the extension of prosecutorial disclosure obligations to the guilty plea stage and increased restrictions on coercive bargaining practices by prosecutors seeking to induce defendants to plead guilty.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: plea bargaining, right to counsel, constitution, criminal law, criminal procedure, guilty, coercive bargaining, Supreme Court, constitutional criminal procedure, guilty pleas
JEL Classification: K14, K30, K39, K40, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: June 23, 2013 ; Last revised: August 20, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds