Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2284411
 


 



Joint Patent Infringement Following Akamai


Nathaniel Grow


University of Georgia - Department of Insurance, Legal Studies, Real Estate

June 24, 2013

American Business Law Journal, Vol. 51, Pp. 71-117 (2014)

Abstract:     
This article provides a critical analysis of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals’ 2012 en banc decision in Akamai Technologies v. Limelight Networks. In Akamai, the Federal Circuit significantly altered the law of inducement in order to address cases of so-called "divided" or "joint" patent infringement, in which no single actor directly infringes the patent-in-suit, but where two or more parties collectively perform each step of an asserted patent claim. This article argues that the Akamai decision was unjustified as a matter of statutory interpretation, legislative history, and public policy, and further contends that the Federal Circuit’s new standard can still potentially be circumvented with relative ease. Nevertheless, the article concludes that following Akamai, parties are increasingly likely to rely on inducement liability when targeting acts of joint infringement in the future, raising some important strategic issues for patentees to consider.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 41

Keywords: Patent law, joint infringement, divided infringement, inducement, Akamai, Limelight, Federal Circuit, CAFC

JEL Classification: 034, K11, K20, K33

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 26, 2013 ; Last revised: February 3, 2014

Suggested Citation

Grow, Nathaniel, Joint Patent Infringement Following Akamai (June 24, 2013). American Business Law Journal, Vol. 51, Pp. 71-117 (2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2284411 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2284411

Contact Information

Nathaniel Grow (Contact Author)
University of Georgia - Department of Insurance, Legal Studies, Real Estate ( email )
Athens, GA 30602-6254
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 447
Downloads: 91
Download Rank: 168,385
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.218 seconds