Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2288207
 


 



Disputed Interrogation Techniques in America: True and False Confessions and the Estimation and Valuation of Type I and II Errors


Deborah Davis


University of Nevada, Reno

Richard A. Leo


University of San Francisco - School of Law

Michael J. Williams


University of Nevada, Reno

June 1, 2013

in Sarah Cooper, ed., Controversies in Innocence Cases in America (Ashgate Publishing 2014).
Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2013-27

Abstract:     
American studies of wrongful conviction have revealed a disturbing pattern. For roughly 25 percent of such cases the defendant was wrongfully convicted in part as the result of a false confession or false guilty plea. In this chapter, we first discuss the evidence that false confessions are a problem. We then review the causes of false confession, with emphasis on police interrogation techniques and interrogation-induced false confession. In this context, we discuss the specific interrogation techniques most strongly implicated in the production of false confessions, as well as specific reforms widely suggested by interrogation scholars to reduce the incidence of interrogation-induced false confession. Finally, the main body of the chapter addresses the issue of how the courts have treated the difficult issues raised by the undeniable problem of false confession and the role of coercive interrogation practices in producing them. Specifically, we address the courts’ rulings regarding the acceptability of specific interrogation practices and the conditions under which a confession is to be regarded as “voluntary” and hence admissible as evidence in trial.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: criminal law, wrongful conviction, false confession, police interrogation, criminal justice, law enforcement, criminal procedure

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 2, 2013 ; Last revised: June 26, 2014

Suggested Citation

Davis, Deborah and Leo, Richard A. and Williams, Michael J., Disputed Interrogation Techniques in America: True and False Confessions and the Estimation and Valuation of Type I and II Errors (June 1, 2013). in Sarah Cooper, ed., Controversies in Innocence Cases in America (Ashgate Publishing 2014).; Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2013-27. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2288207

Contact Information

Deborah Davis
University of Nevada, Reno ( email )
Reno, NV 89557
United States
Richard A. Leo (Contact Author)
University of San Francisco - School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
Michael J. Williams
University of Nevada, Reno ( email )
Reno, NV 89557
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 962
Downloads: 340
Download Rank: 50,721

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds