Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2290813
 


 



The Hazards of Dukes: The Substantive Consequences of a Procedural Decision


Natalie Bucciarelli Pedersen


Drexel University - Earle Mack School of Law

September 2012


Abstract:     
In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, the U.S. Supreme Court not only reversed the grant of class certification to one of the largest employment discrimination classes ever, but also indelibly altered the substance of employment discrimination law. While many scholars have lamented the fact that this potential class action was not allowed to move forward, this article is the first to look comprehensively at the possible substantive changes that the Dukes decision may effect on cases brought pursuant to Title VII. Specifically, this article examines the language of Dukes, as contrasted with Supreme Court precedent in the areas of unjustified disparate impact and systemic disparate treatment cases. The article also analyzes Dukes' potential effect on discrimination cases that rely on social framework evidence. The inevitable conclusion is nothing short of shocking: the Court, in this supposedly procedural decision, has rewritten much of the substance of employment discrimination law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 8, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Pedersen, Natalie Bucciarelli, The Hazards of Dukes: The Substantive Consequences of a Procedural Decision (September 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2290813 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2290813

Contact Information

Natalie Bucciarelli Pedersen (Contact Author)
Drexel University - Earle Mack School of Law ( email )
3320 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 259
Downloads: 33

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds