Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=229094
 


 



A Note on Trend-Spotting in the Case Law


Keith N. Hylton


Boston University - School of Law


Boston College Law Review, Vol. 40, Pp. 891-896, July 1999

Abstract:     
This note, largely a comment on an article by Robert Hillman,
describes and contrasts two models of legal evolution. The orthodox view holds that legal evolution occurs through the active effort of judges. An alternative view models legal evolution as the outcome of the trial selection process - i.e., the process through which disputes are selected for trial rather than settled. This note critiques the orthodox view and explores implications of the trial selection model. I find the empirical evidence inconsistent with the orthodox view.

Accepted Paper Series





Not Available For Download

Date posted: July 31, 2000  

Suggested Citation

Hylton, Keith N., A Note on Trend-Spotting in the Case Law. Boston College Law Review, Vol. 40, Pp. 891-896, July 1999. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=229094

Contact Information

Keith N. Hylton (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-8959 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 369

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.250 seconds