Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2293141
 
 

References (78)



 


 



Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act


Pierre Larouche


Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC); College of Europe - Bruges; Tilburg University - Tilburg Law School; Center on Regulation in Europe (CERRE)

Maarten Pieter Schinkel


University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE); Tinbergen Institute - Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam (TIA)

May 2013

TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2013-020

Abstract:     
In this paper we compare the concepts of monopolization and abuse of dominance as in §2 of the Sherman Act and Article 102 of the TFEU, respectively. After identifying a number of distinctive features in wording and interpretation – including the special responsibility of the dominant firm, competition of the merits and protection of the competitive process – we discuss three lines of argument to explain these differences. The first builds on ordo-liberalism, with its concern for the absence of market power and for the resilience of competitive markets, which influenced EU competition law from the very beginning. The second line of argument derives from the observation that public competition law enforcement is fallible, which self-enforcement could remedy. The third argument explains some of these differences via innovation, whereby Article 102 would reflect a European perspective on innovation. We subsequently return to the underutilized EU category of exploitative abuses and argue that economic techniques developed in the context of damages litigation could open it up for future enforcement in a way that would be in line with ordo-liberal principles, properly understood.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: monopolization, abuse of dominance, ordo-liberalism, error-risk analysis

JEL Classification: B150, K210, L410

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 13, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Larouche, Pierre and Schinkel, Maarten Pieter, Continental Drift in the Treatment of Dominant Firms: Article 102 TFEU in Contrast to § 2 Sherman Act (May 2013). TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2013-020. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2293141 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2293141

Contact Information

Pierre Larouche (Contact Author)
Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC) ( email ) ( email )
Warandelaan 2
Montesquieu Building, Room M 535
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands
+31.13.466.8270 (Phone)
College of Europe - Bruges ( email )
Dijver 11
B-8000 Brugge, Oost Vlanderen 10000
Belgium
Tilburg University - Tilburg Law School ( email ) ( email )
Warandelaan 2
Montesquieu Building, Room M 535
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands
+31.13.466.8270 (Phone)
Center on Regulation in Europe (CERRE) ( email )
Rue de l'Industrie 42
Brussels, 1040
Belgium
Maarten Pieter Schinkel
University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE) ( email )
Roetersstraat 11
1018 WB Amsterdam
Netherlands
+31 20 525 7132 (Phone)
+31 20 525 5318 (Fax)
Tinbergen Institute - Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam (TIA) ( email )
Gustav Mahlerplein 117
Amsterdam, 1082 MS
Netherlands
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,199
Downloads: 237
Download Rank: 72,914
References:  78

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.703 seconds