Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2293449
 
 

References (113)



 


 



Critical Analysis of Acquitted Conduct Sentencing in the U.S.: 'Kafka-Esque', 'Repugnant', 'Uniquely Malevolent' and 'Pernicious'?


Orhun Hakan Yalincak


University of Oxford, Centre for Criminology, Law Faculty, Alumnus; University of Durham, Alumnus; State University of New York (ESC), Alumnus

August 21, 2014

54 Santa Clara Law Review 676 (2014).

Abstract:     
In federal court and many state courts across the United States, once a defendant is convicted, judges are routinely permitted, and in fact, sometimes required to increase a defendant’s sentence based on relevant conduct, of which he was acquitted at trial, or conduct for which he was never charged. This article highlights the issues that arise from the use of acquitted conduct sentencing under the now advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The use of acquitted conduct under the relevant conduct provisions of the Guidelines has resulted in substantially longer prison sentences with a disparate impact on racial and ethnic minorities. Acquitted conduct sentencing treats the offense admitted by a defendant, or proven to a judge or jury’s satisfaction beyond a reasonable doubt as only the starting point in calculating a defendant’s sentence; the modified real offense approach, which incorporates relevant conduct and mandates consideration of acquitted conduct, determines the end sentence. This article concludes that use of acquitted conduct should be prohibited both on constitutional and normative grounds. While it is outside the scope of this article to offer a comprehensive solution or alternative to the use of acquitted conduct at sentencing, the key observation is that since the common thread linking the constitutional and normative issues arise from the fragmented nature of U.S. sentencing policy, the solution must start with re-conceptualizing the theories underlying sentencing in the United States.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: state punishment, theories and rationales of punishment, acquitted conduct sentencing, relevant conduct, sentencing guidelines, sentencing rationale, role of jury

JEL Classification: K14, K19, K30, K40, K41, K42, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 15, 2013 ; Last revised: August 27, 2014

Suggested Citation

Yalincak, Orhun Hakan, Critical Analysis of Acquitted Conduct Sentencing in the U.S.: 'Kafka-Esque', 'Repugnant', 'Uniquely Malevolent' and 'Pernicious'? (August 21, 2014). 54 Santa Clara Law Review 676 (2014). . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2293449 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2293449

Contact Information

Orhun Hakan Yalincak (Contact Author)
University of Oxford, Centre for Criminology, Law Faculty, Alumnus ( email )
Mansfield Road
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 4AU
United Kingdom
University of Durham, Alumnus ( email )
Old Elvet
Mill Hill Lane
Durham, DH1 3HP
United Kingdom
State University of New York (ESC), Alumnus ( email )
Vestal Parkway East
Binghamton, NY 13902
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 633
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 165,836
References:  113

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.219 seconds