Truth-Telling by Third-Party Auditors and the Response of Polluting Firms: Experimental Evidence from India
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics; Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL); National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR); Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development (BREAD)
University of Chicago - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS)
Harvard University; Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab Global
July 17, 2013
MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 13-17
In many regulated markets, private, third-party auditors are chosen and paid by the firms that they audit, potentially creating a conflict of interest. This paper reports on a two-year field experiment in the Indian state of Gujarat that sought to curb such a conflict by altering the market structure for environmental audits of industrial plants to incentivize accurate reporting. There are three main results. First, the status quo system was largely corrupted; with auditors systematically reporting plant emissions just below the standard, although true emissions were typically higher. Second, the treatment caused auditors to report more truthfully and very significantly lowered the fraction of plants that were falsely reported as compliant with pollution standards. Third, treatment plants, in turn, reduced their pollution emissions. The results suggest reformed incentives for third-party auditors can improve their reporting and make regulation more effective.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49
Keywords: Third-party auditing, environment and development, environmental regulation, information intermediaries, industrial pollution
JEL Classification: O13, Q56, L51, M42
Date posted: July 17, 2013 ; Last revised: September 3, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.297 seconds