Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2294766
 


 



Free Exercise Reconceived: The Logic and Limits of Hosanna-Tabor


Christopher C. Lund


Wayne State University Law School

July 16, 2013

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 108, No. 2 (2014, Forthcoming)
Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2013-18

Abstract:     
Last term, in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC, the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment precludes ministers from bringing employment-related claims against their churches. In some ways, Hosanna-Tabor changed little. The lower courts had all reached that conclusion already, though the Supreme Court slightly expanded the breadth of the so-called ministerial exception. More important is how Hosanna-Tabor reconceptualized things, especially in how it pushed back somewhat against the Supreme Court’s imperial decision in Employment Division v. Smith, where the Court had broadly held that the Free Exercise Clause did not entitle religious believers to exemptions from generally applicable laws.

Hosanna-Tabor could end up an isolated anomaly, a peculiar concession to the importance of ministers and the intrusiveness of employment discrimination laws, a railroad ticket good for one day and train only. But the Court’s opinion speaks of a broader principle, a principle whose boundaries it consciously puts off defining. And when one looks at the cases being decided in the lower courts, one is struck by how so many decisions seem to fall within Hosanna-Tabor’s principle. From employment discrimination law to labor law, from contract to tort, lower courts regularly dismiss all manner of cases in ways incompatible with Smith and for reasons akin to those given in Hosanna-Tabor. This Article looks at that universe of cases, reflects on some patterns that emerge, and works toward an explanation for what is happening and how courts should handle these issues across the board.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 47

Keywords: Free Exercise Clause, Establishment Clause, church and state, religion, church autonomy, Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC, Employment Division v. Smith

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2013 ; Last revised: January 24, 2014

Suggested Citation

Lund, Christopher C., Free Exercise Reconceived: The Logic and Limits of Hosanna-Tabor (July 16, 2013). Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 108, No. 2 (2014, Forthcoming); Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2013-18. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2294766

Contact Information

Christopher C. Lund (Contact Author)
Wayne State University Law School ( email )
471 Palmer
Detroit, MI 48202
United States
(313) 577-4046 (Phone)
(313) 577-9016 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 676
Downloads: 158
Download Rank: 111,265

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds