|
||||
|
||||
The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique ? A Short SurveyPatrick A. PuhaniLeibniz University Hannover; University of St. Gallen - Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); Université Paris II - Panthéon-Assas Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, Pp. 53-68, February 2000 Abstract: This paper gives a short overview of Monte Carlo studies on the usefulness of Heckman?s (1976, 1979) two?step estimator for estimating a selection model. It shows that exploratory work to check for collinearity problems is strongly recommended before deciding on which estimator to apply. In the absence of collinearity problems, the full?information maximum likelihood estimator is preferable to the limited?information two?step method of Heckman, although the latter also gives reasonable results. If, however, collinearity problems prevail, subsample OLS (or the Two?Part Model) is the most robust amongst the simple?to?calculate estimators.
JEL Classification: C15 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 24, 2000Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.797 seconds