Why Civil Gideon Won't Fix Family Law
University of Denver Sturm College of Law
July 23, 2013
Yale Law Journal, Vol. 122, No. 2106, 2013
U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-36
This Essay explains why we should hesitate before throwing full support behind a civil Gideon initiative for family law, regardless of how wholeheartedly we embrace the proposition that parental rights are as important as physical liberty. The comparable importance of these interests does not necessarily mean that custody disputes should have the same procedural character as criminal matters, as becomes evident upon exploring some of the social, emotional, and structural qualities that differentiate the two contexts. Enhancing access to justice in family law requires that we design custody dispute resolution systems that honor the constitutionally significant interests at stake while recognizing the truly unique posture in which separating parents litigate. To pursue civil Gideon as a stand-alone reform falls short of this challenge; it accepts the primacy of a lawyer-centric adversary system as the preferred means for resolving custody disputes in the face of growing evidence that this framework does more harm than good for most domestic relations litigants.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 24, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds