Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2297660
 


 



Restoring Law in Comparative Law and Economics


Lindsey D. Carson


Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS); University of Toronto Faculty of Law

July 23, 2013


Abstract:     
This article examines the explanatory potential and limitations of the use of economic models and quantitative analytic techniques in comparative law. It suggests that the incorporation of comprehensive, rigorous legal analysis in both the design of empirical models and the interpretation of quantitative results can improve the accuracy of descriptive and prescriptive conclusions by addressing concerns related to variable selection; data selection, collection, and coding; the robustness of causal claims; and appreciation (or lack thereof) for the complex roles and functions of laws and their interactions with social norms and other institutions. This article argues that, while large-scale quantitative research methods can provide valuable information to inform policy decisions and strategies, the limitations of their explanatory and predictive powers must be acknowledged and tempered by context-specific, nuanced analysis of legal rules and systems, especially when guiding reform efforts within and across countries.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 33

Keywords: comparative law and economics, corruption, foreign bribery, OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials, United Nations' Oil-for-Food Programme

JEL Classification: K33, K42, N40

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 24, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Carson, Lindsey D., Restoring Law in Comparative Law and Economics (July 23, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2297660 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2297660

Contact Information

Lindsey D. Carson (Contact Author)
Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) ( email )
1740 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036-1984
United States
University of Toronto Faculty of Law ( email )
78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 217
Downloads: 53
Download Rank: 232,196

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds