Do Fraudulent Firms Engage in Disclosure Herding?
University of Maryland - Department of Finance
Craig M. Lewis
Vanderbilt University - Finance
August 14, 2013
Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management Research Paper No. 2298302
Robert H. Smith School Research Paper
We present two new hypotheses regarding the strategic qualitative disclosure choices of firms involved in potentially fraudulent activity. First, these firms have incentives to herd with industry peers in order to escape detection. Second, these firms have incentives to locally anti-herd with the same peers on specific aspects of disclosure consistent with achieving fraud-driven objectives. We use text-based analysis of firm disclosures and compare disclosures across firms involved in SEC enforcement actions to benchmarks based on industry, size and age, and also to each firm's own disclosure before and after SEC alleged violations. We find especially strong support for the conclusion that firms involved in alleged fraud anti-herd with industry peers on localized disclosure dimensions. We find moderately strong support for the conclusion that they herd with industry peers on broader disclosure dimensions. Content analysis then reveals key vocabulary terms used by firms involved in enforcement actions, and suggests that these firms use complexity to potentially conceal fraudulent activity, and these firms often discuss issues relating to uncertainty, litigation, and speculative statements.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 53
Keywords: Fraud, Disclosure, Herding, Litigation, Text Analytics, Enforcement
JEL Classification: G34, G38, G39, M41working papers series
Date posted: July 26, 2013 ; Last revised: October 10, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.875 seconds