Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2302709
 
 

References (65)



 


 



Property Theory, Essential Resources, and the Global Land Rush


Hanoch Dagan


Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law

July 29, 2013


Abstract:     
Recent large scale transnational transfers of land threaten members of rural communities in the developing world who rely for food and shelter on access to land they lack formal title to. Contrary to some of the conventional wisdom, this Essay argues that liberal property theory provides important inroads for addressing this challenge. Properly interpreted, property requires an ongoing (albeit properly cautious) redefinition of existing property institutions as well as the design of new ones, in light of changing circumstances and in response to the liberal property values of personal independence, labor, personhood, aggregate welfare, community, and distributive justice. These property values imply that the new, transnational land market must accommodate a property institution for essential resources that secures the individual and collective rights of pre-existing users. Securing these rights does not require that we reject the logic of competitive markets. Quite the contrary. One promising path for realizing these rights is to strengthen competition through properly designed auctions that ensure the members of local communities choices between outright sale offers and equity investment in local cooperatives.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 30, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Dagan, Hanoch, Property Theory, Essential Resources, and the Global Land Rush (July 29, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2302709 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2302709

Contact Information

Hanoch Dagan (Contact Author)
Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978, IL
Israel
+972 3 640 7302 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 231
Downloads: 59
Download Rank: 220,745
References:  65

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds