The Gender Citation Gap
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Department of Political Science
Ryan M. Powers
University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Political Science
Barbara F. Walter
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies (IRPS)
APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper
American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting
This article investigates the extent to which citation and publication patterns differ between men and women in the international relations (IR) literature. Using data from the Teaching, Research, and International Policy project on peer-reviewed publications between 1980 and 2007, we show that women are systematically cited less than men after controlling for a large number of variables including year of publication, quality of publication, substantive focus, theoretical perspective, methodology, tenure status, and institutional affiliation. These results are robust to a variety of modeling choices. We then turn to network analysis to investigate the extent to which the gender of an article’s author affects that article’s relative centrality in the network of citations between papers in our sample. Articles authored by women are systematically less central than articles authored by men, all else equal. This is likely because (1) women tend to cite themselves less than men, and (1) men (who make up a disproportionate share of IR scholars) tend to cite men more than women. This is the first study in political science to reveal significant gender differences in citation patterns and is especially meaningful because citation counts are increasingly used as a key measure of research’s quality and impact.
Keywords: gender, history of the discipline, international relationsworking papers series
Date posted: August 5, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.453 seconds