Unspoken Truths and Misaligned Interests: Political Parties and the Two Cultures of Civil Litigation
Stephen C. Yeazell
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
August 6, 2013
60 UCLA Law Review, 2013
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 13-25
During the last four decades the United States has witnessed first the emergence and then the disappearance of civil litigation as a topic of partisan debate in national politics. Following two centuries in which neither party thought the topic worth mention, in the last decades of the twentieth and first of the twenty-first century, both parties made it part of their agendas. Republican candidates and presidents denounced litigation as a blight; Democratic candidates and presidents embraced it as a panacea. This Essay traces the emergence of this issue, the apparent oddness of the two parties’ stances toward civil litigation, and the ways in which both parties chose to ignore salient characteristics of modern civil litigation — the unspoken truths of my title. Finally, I’ll tentatively suggest some reasons for the disappearance of this issue — at least temporarily — from the political scene.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: civil litigation, partisan debate on civil litigation, history of civil litigation
Date posted: August 7, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.594 seconds