Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2308008
 


 



Restoration, Retribution, or Revenge? Time Shifting Victim Impact Statements in American Judicial Process


Tracy Hresko Pearl


Texas Tech University School of Law

August 2013

Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2014, Forthcoming
Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-15

Abstract:     
Courts currently permit victims to offer victim impact statement in criminal proceedings in all 50 states and federal jurisdictions. However, victim impact statements introduce serious constitutional problems into criminal cases by (1) creating inconsistencies in sentencing, (2) injecting bias and prejudice into formal courtroom proceedings, (3) giving judges and prosecutors an opportunity to reject testimony that might sway jurors toward more lenient punishments, and (4) leaving defendants with little opportunity to mitigate their impact on decision-makers. Scholars, therefore, have resoundingly called for the exclusion of victim impact statements from criminal proceedings in the United States. In this article, I take a decidedly different position and argue instead that victim impact statements are, in fact, salvageable. Specifically, I look to lessons from the restorative justice movement and propose a solution that relies on time shifting victim impact statements to the close of criminal proceedings. By removing victim impact statements from trials and sentencing and requiring that they be offered afterwards, their constitutional deficiencies can be virtually eliminated and their numerous benefits preserved.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Victims' Rights Movement, victim impact statements, criminal proceedings, United States, history, benefits, exclusion, constitutional issues, restorative justice, sentencing, Victims' Rights and Restitution Act, Victims' Bill of Rights, retributive system, Fifth, Eight Amendment

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 14, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Pearl, Tracy Hresko, Restoration, Retribution, or Revenge? Time Shifting Victim Impact Statements in American Judicial Process (August 2013). Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2014, Forthcoming; Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2308008

Contact Information

Tracy Hresko Pearl (Contact Author)
Texas Tech University School of Law ( email )
1802 Hartford
Lubbock, TX 79409
United States
(806) 834-7055 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 553
Downloads: 171
Download Rank: 103,294

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds