Bar Passage: GPA and LSAT, Not Bar Reviews
Nicholas L. Georgakopoulos
Indiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law
September 19, 2013
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-30
Probit regressions of bar passage on law GPA, undergraduate GPA (uGPA) and LSAT show GPA to have a very strong relation, LSAT a weaker one, and uGPA not to have any relation. 1L and upperclass GPA both have strong predictive power, favoring an interpretation of significant learning in small and elective courses compared to the mandated large ones of the first year. Linear regressions of GPA on uGPA and LSAT show a noisy relation to exist only for first-time bar exam takers, none for 2nd time takers. Analysis of bar review courses does not show the choice among them to have consequence. Possible interpretations favor legal education over innate skill and the training in legal analysis over memorization.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31
Keywords: LSAT, Bar Passage, Bar Examination, Law School Curriculum, 1L Curriculum, Bar Preparation, Probit Regression
JEL Classification: Z00Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 11, 2013 ; Last revised: November 4, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds