Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2308590
 


 



Tort as a Substitute for Revenge


Scott Hershovitz


University of Michigan Law School

August 11, 2013

Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts, John Oberdiek (ed.), (OUP, 2014 Forthcoming)
U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 348

Abstract:     
In 1870, William Alcorn sued Andrew Mitchell for trespass. His suit did not go well, and at the end of trial, just after the court adjourned, Alcorn spit in Mitchell’s face. Mitchell then turned the tables and sued Alcorn for battery. He won a judgment for $1000, which the Illinois Supreme Court approved on the ground that awarding “liberal damages . . . save[d] the necessity of resort to personal violence as the only means of redress.” In the Court’s view, Alcorn had to pay so that Mitchell would not have to strike back.

The idea that tort suits substitute for revenge is still with us today. But it is not clear how the substitution is supposed to work. Taking Alcorn v. Mitchell as a template, I argue that the primary reason for regarding tort as a substitute for revenge is that both are tools for doing corrective justice. Along the way, I develop and defend a communicative conception of corrective justice, and I argue that tort and revenge share similar expressive aims.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: tort, revenge, alcorn v. mitchell, corrective justice, punitive damages, compensatory damages

JEL Classification: K13

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 11, 2013 ; Last revised: September 17, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hershovitz, Scott, Tort as a Substitute for Revenge (August 11, 2013). Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Torts, John Oberdiek (ed.), (OUP, 2014 Forthcoming); U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 348. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2308590

Contact Information

Scott Hershovitz (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 882
Downloads: 243
Download Rank: 71,091

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds