Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2308994
 
 

References (109)



 


 



Do Activist Investors Constrain Managerial Moral Hazard in Chapter 11?: Evidence from Junior Activist Investing


Jared A. Ellias


University of California, Hastings

May 23, 2014

Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No. 155
Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 451

Abstract:     
In recent years, hedge funds and other activist investors that specialize in bankruptcy investing have emerged as important players in virtually every large Chapter 11 case. These activist investors buy junior claims and deploy aggressive litigation tactics to gain influence in the restructuring process. The consensus among bankruptcy lawyers is that this behavior has had a negative effect on Chapter 11. Junior activists are considered by many to be out of the money rent seekers that try to extract hold-up value from senior creditors, increasing the administrative costs of bankruptcy and reducing the ultimate recovery of creditors. Junior activists, however, believe they counter the perverse incentives of managers of Chapter 11 debtors. Chapter 11 leaves managers in control of the bankruptcy process and requires them to maximize creditor recoveries. In performing this duty, managers face moral hazard. If the firm is reorganized in a transaction that is appraised at a discount to the firm’s true value, managers and senior creditors can profit at the expense of junior claimants. Junior activists claim they intervene to stop managers and senior creditors from extracting value from junior claimants. In this paper, I perform the first empirical study of junior activism. I develop a new methodology that measures junior activism and I use it to study a hand-collected dataset of large firms filing for Chapter 11 in 2009 and 2010. I find that junior activism is correlated with an increase in the appraised value of the restructuring transaction, supporting the view of junior activists that they constrain management’s ability to extract value from junior claimants by underappraising the firm. Although there is some evidence of cost increases associated with junior activism, these increases are small in relation to the potential benefits of junior activism. The results undermine the consensus view of junior activism and suggest that junior activists promote the bankruptcy policy goals of maximizing creditor recoveries and distributing the firm’s value in accordance with the absolute priority rule.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 72

Keywords: Chapter 11, activist investors, distressed debt

JEL Classification: G23, G30, G33

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 14, 2013 ; Last revised: September 22, 2014

Suggested Citation

Ellias, Jared A., Do Activist Investors Constrain Managerial Moral Hazard in Chapter 11?: Evidence from Junior Activist Investing (May 23, 2014). Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper No. 155; Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 451. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2308994 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2308994

Contact Information

Jared A. Ellias (Contact Author)
University of California, Hastings ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,088
Downloads: 166
Download Rank: 112,223
References:  109

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.312 seconds