Uncommon Goods: On Environmental Virtues and Voluntary Carbon Offsets
Jeffrey M. Skopek
Harvard Law School
Harvard Law Review, Vol. 123, No. 8, pp. 2065-2087, June 2010
While the use of carbon offsets as a regulatory tool has been the subject of extensive academic debate, the purely voluntary purchase of offsets has received virtually no attention, presumably because it appears to be normatively unproblematic. This article argues that this lack of concern is misguided, and for reasons that the well-developed critiques of offsets — based in consequentialist and deontological frameworks — fail to identify.
Developing a virtue-based account of some of the values that have long been protected by environmentalism, I argue that the voluntary market threatens these values in three ways. First, the market translates environmental harm into something measured in carbon, facilitating environmental use governed solely by a principle of efficiency. Second, the market allows people to “do their part” without altering what they do, effacing the idea that the protection of the environment is the type of burden that all members of a society must carry equally. Third, the market treats all carbon the same, dissolving qualitative distinctions between types of carbon emissions and the non-consequentialist conception of wastefulness in which they are grounded. In short, the market reshapes the principles that govern environmental consumption, the mechanism by which environmental action is achieved, and the conceptual framework in which environmental impacts are understood.
For these reasons, the market does not merely allow for the exercise of preexisting environmental commitments, but rather can reshape the ethic that motivated these commitments in the first instance. Thus, even if the purchase of voluntary offsets will bring about a reduction in aggregate emissions, it does not necessarily follow that such purchases are normatively desirable. The good of carbon neutrality is at odds with a set of goods traditionally protected by environmentalism.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: voluntary carbon markets, environmental virtue ethics, carbon offsets, carbon creditsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 16, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 1.063 seconds