Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2310815
 


 



South Sudan's Dualistic Constitution


Kevin L. Cope


Georgetown University Law Center

July 2013

The Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, 2013

Abstract:     
In a seven-day referendum held in January 2011, 98.8 percent of Southern Sudanese voters elected to sever Southern Sudan’s ties with the Republic of Sudan and form an independent nation. With the referendum, the Southern Sudanese people gave themselves the right to decide for themselves the core principles that would underlie their new sovereignty.

One of the prerogatives of this sovereignty was adopting a new constitution. In contrast to the populist exercise that enabled South Sudan’s independence, the country’s first constitution was developed and shaped largely by two very different influences: international constitutional models and the political priorities of leaders within the dominant domestic party. It is unsurprising that an important political process would lack meaningful, broad public participation in a country whose parent is notorious for its autocratic rule and abysmal human rights. But what makes South Sudan’s constitution noteworthy is its dualistic structure. That is, the two influences – international models and domestic politics – primarily operated on one of the constitution’s two discrete components, namely, the bill of rights and the structural provisions, respectively. With a few key exceptions, the bill of rights replicates an international template reflecting an emerging global consensus on human rights. In contrast, the document’s structural provisions, although certainly not untouched by external influence, have largely been crafted to advance the priorities of the drafters. Some of these provisions flout both democratic and liberal values, making them quite incongruous with the structural provisions of model democratic countries, such as South Africa, Canada, and Germany. Because of this arrangement, domestic officials and participating foreign consultants can point to their successes in helping codify important human rights, while party and government officials enjoy the fruits of their structural power play.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: constitutionalism, comparative law, Africa, South Sudan

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 16, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Cope, Kevin L., South Sudan's Dualistic Constitution (July 2013). The Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2310815

Contact Information

Kevin L. Cope (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
McDonough 480
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 363
Downloads: 90
Download Rank: 173,470

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds