SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 


 



The Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege: Loss Of Predictability Does Not Justify Crying Wolfinbarger

Paul R. Rice
American University - Washington College of Law



Business Lawyer, Vol. 55, No. 2, February 2000

Abstract:     
The corporate attorney-client privilege is woven in fragile logic. A privilege protection designed to encourage a client to speak freely with an attorney is given to an entity that cannot speak and denied to those who speak for that entity. A privilege, historically construed narrowly to avoid the unnecessary suppression of relevant evidence, is extended to an entity whose management and employees have independent economic incentives to seek legal advice and speak with the lawyer from whom that advice is sought. A recent proposal to reassess the fiduciary duty exception to the corporate privilege, premised on the protection?s diminished predictability, is, at best, ethereal and runs the serious risk of unraveling our legal fiction?s best kept secret--that the emperor is wearing no clothes.

The author has written two other treatises on the attorney-client privilege, P.R. Rice, Attorney-Client Privilege in the United States (West Group 2nd ed. 1999) and Attorney-Client Privilege: State Law (Rice Publishing 2000) (on computer diskettes). For more information about the treatises, readers could refer to his webpage: acprivilege.com

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: July 11, 2000 ; Last revised: November 23, 2004

Suggested Citation

Rice, Paul R., The Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege: Loss Of Predictability Does Not Justify Crying Wolfinbarger. Business Lawyer, Vol. 55, No. 2, February 2000. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=231174


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Paul R. Rice (Contact Author)
American University - Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 615
Downloads: 0

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.094 seconds.