The Alien Tort Statute and the Law of Nations in Kiobel and Beyond

Anthony J. Colangelo

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law


Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 44, p. 1329, 2013

In Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum the U.S. Supreme Court wrongly applied a presumption against extraterritoriality to claims authorized by the Alien Tort Statute (ATS). Even assuming such a presumption properly could extend to the ATS and claims authorized thereunder, the presumption is easily overcome by Congress’s unambiguous instruction that the statute encompasses violations of “the law of nations,” which includes both substantive and jurisdictional components — including principles of extraterritorial jurisdiction. Early 19th Century case law and congressional reaction thereto clearly demonstrate that Congress expressly invoked “the law of nations” to overturn the Court’s imposition of a limiting presumption in the piracy context in order to grant the United States universal jurisdiction over that offense. Rather than rely on this strong indicia of congressional intent, the Court in Kiobel instead seized upon a judicially invented presumption that came into existence twenty years after the ATS was enacted, gave it novel application to a jurisdictional statute and claims authorized thereunder, and then projected it backward in time.

Yet Kiobel nonetheless correctly determined that conduct-regulating rules of decision under the ATS derive from international law and that domestic law of the forum, or lex fori, provides procedures and remedies. This framework is consistent with public and private law principles of the law of nations under which the statute ought to be construed. Although this framework should have led the Court to conclude that the claims in Kiobel were actionable, the Court’s misunderstanding has not completely erased the possibility of future claims involving foreign elements from being brought under the statute. The Court left the door open for claims that sufficiently “touch and concern” the United States. The Article concludes that, going forward, courts should use international law for the conduct-regulating rules under the ATS and domestic law for procedures and remedies. Jurisdictional principles of the law of nations ought to guide analysis of whether claims involving foreign elements sufficiently touch and concern the United States so as to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Alien Tort Statute, jurisdiction, choice of law

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: August 20, 2013 ; Last revised: February 7, 2015

Suggested Citation

Colangelo, Anthony J., The Alien Tort Statute and the Law of Nations in Kiobel and Beyond (2013). Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 44, p. 1329, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2313217

Contact Information

Anthony J. Colangelo (Contact Author)
Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States
2147682372 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 298
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 184,003

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.374 seconds