Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2314237
 


 



The Paradox of Australian Competition Policy: Contextualising the Coexistence of Economic Efficiency and Public Benefit


Vijaya L. Nagarajan


Macquarie University

2013

(2013) 36(1) World Competition: Law and Economics Review 133 - 163

Abstract:     
Although competition law is viewed as being focussed on fostering competition, there is more depth to it. Australian competition policy has been designed to provide space for public benefits, whereby prima facie anticompetitive conducts that eventually result in a public benefit can continue. This is a unique feature which reveals the importance of having flexibility in legislative design and the benefits of case by case approach.

The objective of this article is to identify the types of public benefits that have been recognised through the authorisation process in Australian competition law. The article uses an innovative methodology to study 244 authorisation determinations made between 1976 and 2010 and analyses them in their economic and social context. This study demonstrates that the authorisation process has been a valuable one which has allowed competition policy to operate effectively while accommodating many wider concerns. Conducts that promote competition or encourage cost savings have been recognised alongside those which enhance product safety or encourages environmental protection, demonstrating the complexity and breadth of competition law in practice. This type of decision making can be explained as a triumph of practice.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: August 22, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Nagarajan, Vijaya L., The Paradox of Australian Competition Policy: Contextualising the Coexistence of Economic Efficiency and Public Benefit (2013). (2013) 36(1) World Competition: Law and Economics Review 133 - 163. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2314237

Contact Information

Vijaya L. Nagarajan (Contact Author)
Macquarie University ( email )
PO Box 2109
SYDNEY, 2110
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 168

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.250 seconds