Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2315256
 


 



'All Life is an Experiment': Research Tool Patents, Epistemological Monopolies, and the First Amendment


Peter Lee


University of California, Davis - School of Law

August 23, 2013

UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 348

Abstract:     
Patents on research tools — technological inputs to basic scientific research — have attracted significant scholarly attention. Most of the existing literature focuses on the potential for such patents to inhibit basic scientific research and downstream commercial development through creating tragedies of the anticommons. While some empirical work has cast doubt on the anticommons theory, the potential for research tools to inhibit basic research persists. Building upon these economic accounts of research tool patents, this Article examines the First Amendment implications of exclusive rights on foundational research technologies. Examining several prevailing theories of the First Amendment, it argues that exclusive rights on research tools may seriously jeopardize traditional First Amendment interests in facilitating a robust marketplace of ideas, ensuring individual self-realization, promoting democratic discourse, and checking central political authority.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: patents, First Amendment, research tools, biomedical science, tragedy of the anticommons, legal theory


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 25, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Lee, Peter, 'All Life is an Experiment': Research Tool Patents, Epistemological Monopolies, and the First Amendment (August 23, 2013). UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 348. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2315256 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2315256

Contact Information

Peter Lee (Contact Author)
University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )
Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
Davis, CA CA 95616-5201
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 193
Downloads: 24
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.203 seconds