To Regulate or Not to Regulate, or (Better Still) When to Regulate
Herbert M. Kritzer
University of Minnesota Law School
Dispute Resolution Magazine, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Spring 2013), pp. 12-13
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-37
This short essay, which appeared as part of a symposium on whether ADR should be subject to regulation, suggests that the consideration of regulation should be framed in terms of two dimensions: the nature of the parties (sophisticated versus unsophisticated) and how the parties came to ADR (post-dispute, pre-dispute negotiated, or pre-dispute take it or leave it). The essay suggests that the need for regulation ranges from very strong when one party is sophisticated and the other is unsophisticated and the parties come to ADR as a result of a pre-dispute agreement offered as part of a take it or leave it transaction, to nil when ADR has been agreed to by two sophisticated parties through a process of pre-dispute negotiation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 3Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 28, 2013 ; Last revised: August 31, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds