Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2317055
 


 



Taxation by Analogy


Graeme S. Cooper


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

August 27, 2013

Australian Tax Review, Vol. 42, 2013, Forthcoming
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 13/66

Abstract:     
This paper argues that all anti-abuse rules in tax law require both a destruction and reconstruction step. The paper considers the claim, which prompted the 2013 changes, that Australia’s reconstruction rule was defective and then examines some of the theoretical options that were available for reforming the reconstruction step. It discusses some issues arising from the way the preferred rules are now built on an inconsistent foundation and ponders some of the curious outcomes that may arise when the new provisions have to be applied. While the mechanisms chosen for Australia may seem odd and contradictory, the experience elsewhere in the common law world does not offer a more cogent approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Taxation, tax avoidance, statutory general anti-avoidance rules, reconstruction powers

JEL Classification: H20, H25, H26, K34, K42

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 29, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Cooper, Graeme S., Taxation by Analogy (August 27, 2013). Australian Tax Review, Vol. 42, 2013, Forthcoming; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 13/66. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2317055

Contact Information

Graeme S. Cooper (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 149
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 208,639
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Corporate Tax Reform in Australia: Lucky Escape for Lucky Country?
By Richard Vann

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.438 seconds