Taxation by Analogy

Graeme S. Cooper

University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

August 27, 2013

Australian Tax Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 255-268, 2013
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 13/66

This paper argues that all anti-abuse rules in tax law require both a destruction and reconstruction step. The paper considers the claim, which prompted the 2013 changes, that Australia’s reconstruction rule was defective and then examines some of the theoretical options that were available for reforming the reconstruction step. It discusses some issues arising from the way the preferred rules are now built on an inconsistent foundation and ponders some of the curious outcomes that may arise when the new provisions have to be applied. While the mechanisms chosen for Australia may seem odd and contradictory, the experience elsewhere in the common law world does not offer a more cogent approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Taxation, tax avoidance, statutory general anti-avoidance rules, reconstruction powers

JEL Classification: H20, H25, H26, K34, K42

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: August 29, 2013 ; Last revised: September 29, 2014

Suggested Citation

Cooper, Graeme S., Taxation by Analogy (August 27, 2013). Australian Tax Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 255-268, 2013; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 13/66. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2317055

Contact Information

Graeme S. Cooper (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 366
Downloads: 98
Download Rank: 201,947

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds