Tax, Command -- or Nudge?: Evaluating the New Regulation

Brian D. Galle

Boston College Law School

October 16, 2013

Texas Law Review, Forthcoming

This Article compares for the first time the relative economic efficiency of “nudges” and other forms of behaviorally-inspired regulation against more common policy alternatives, such as taxes, subsidies, or traditional quantity regulation. Environmental economists and some legal commentators have dismissed nudge-type interventions out of hand for their failure to match the revenues and informational benefits taxes can provide. Similarly, writers in the law and economics tradition argue that fines are generally superior to non-pecuniary punishments.

Drawing on prior work in the choice-of-instruments literature, and contrary to this popular wisdom, I show that nudges may out-perform fines, other Pigouvian taxes, or subsidies in some contexts. These same arguments may also imply the superiority of some traditional “command and control” regulations over their tax or subsidy alternatives. I then apply these lessons to a set of contemporary policy controversies, such as New York City’s cap on beverage portion sizes, climate change, retirement savings, and charitable contributions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: nudge, choice of instruments, Pigouvian tax, behavioral law & economics, choice architecture, sticky default

Download This Paper

Date posted: August 29, 2013 ; Last revised: October 16, 2013

Suggested Citation

Galle, Brian D., Tax, Command -- or Nudge?: Evaluating the New Regulation (October 16, 2013). Texas Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2318004

Contact Information

Brian D. Galle (Contact Author)
Boston College Law School ( email )
885 Centre Street
Newton, MA 02459-1163
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 898
Downloads: 272
Download Rank: 68,739

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds