Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2318587
 


 



Private Law: Commutative or Distributive?


Dan Priel


York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

November 26, 2013

Forthcoming Modern Law Review, Volume 77 (2014)
Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 56/2013

Abstract:     
Allan Beever argues in his new book that there are two distinct forms of justice — commutative and distributive — and that we have forgotten about commutative justice, the form of justice that governs our interpersonal relationships. Consequently, we erroneously think of private law from the perspective of distributive justice, the form of justice that governs our relation to the state. Forgetting commutative justice, he claims, has been a serious philosophical mistake with potentially grave practical implications. Theoretically, says Beever, the modern view is wrong, because politics and distributive justice are grounded in our pre-political, interpersonal relationships. In other words, commutative justice is logically prior to distributive justice. Practically, the dominance of the mistaken modern view has led us to think of people too much as part of a collective and not as individuals and to over-emphasize the significance of the state. In this essay I challenge all of Beever’s claims. I argue that there is no basis for the claim that people these days have forgotten about interpersonal relationships, nor of the claim that interpersonal relationship are the foundation for politics. I challenge Beever’s historical account, arguing both that Beever has failed to provide any convincing argument for why commutative justice has been forgotten, and that there are historical facts that explain the changes in the structure of private law that he ignored. I then turn to Beever’s theoretical claims and argue that Beever’s view about the independence of commutative and distributive justice are indefensible. Even accepting pre-political norms of commutative justice as the foundation of politics, it does not follow that contemporary contract law should reflect such norms. Finally, I argue that contrary to Beever’s claim that commutative justice is apolitical, Beever’s views reveal a clear political bent, which Beever never defends.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: private law, commutative justice, corrective justice, distributive justice, history of philosophy

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 27, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Priel, Dan, Private Law: Commutative or Distributive? (November 26, 2013). Forthcoming Modern Law Review, Volume 77 (2014); Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 56/2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2318587

Contact Information

Dan Priel (Contact Author)
York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 485
Downloads: 143
Download Rank: 119,072

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.360 seconds