Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2319919
 


 



The New Textualism, Progressive Constitutionalism, and Abortion Rights: A Reply to Jeffrey Rosen


Neil Siegel


Duke University - School of Law

August 30, 2013

Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2013

Abstract:     
In this Essay, I offer a few thoughts in response to Jeffrey Rosen's contribution to this symposium on Jack Balkin's "Living Originalism". I will first focus on what he writes about the "new textualism." I will then reply to what he intimates about the continuing validity of Roe v. Wade. In short, I will argue that Rosen offers progressives little reason to accept the new textualism or to reject Roe in the name of legal fidelity.

If the abortion right is ultra vires because a lack of decisive warrant in text, structure, and history trumps mediating equality principles and legal doctrine, then so is much else that progressives view as constitutional law. If the new textualism lacks the interpretive resources to justify the abortion right, then neither can it justify other core progressive constitutional commitments. Indeed, abandoning Roe and Casey would be no mere concession that legal progressives would make in the name of fidelity to law. Abandoning the abortion right would entail a huge sacrifice of the very substantive understanding of equality that binds together most progressive understandings of equal citizenship in the areas of discrimination based on race, national origin, ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, and disability.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: abortion rights, textualism, Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, Equal Protection Clause, discrimination

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 4, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Siegel, Neil, The New Textualism, Progressive Constitutionalism, and Abortion Rights: A Reply to Jeffrey Rosen (August 30, 2013). Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2013. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2319919

Contact Information

Neil Siegel (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 223
Downloads: 59
Download Rank: 218,075

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds