Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2320934
 


 



Revisiting Hosanna-Tabor v. E.E.O.C.: The Road Not Taken


Ioanna Tourkochoriti


Harvard Law School; Department of Law - Carleton University

October 1, 2013

Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 49, 2013, pp. 49-98

Abstract:     
The article approaches critically the balancing between freedom of religion and the enforcement of disability anti-discrimination law followed by the Supreme Court in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC. Enforcing disability anti-discrimination law is a compelling interest, as it finds a very strong philosophical justification, making thus the result of the case contrary to the philosophical conception of a well-ordered society. Doing away with the social construct of disability is a compelling interest as it is a universalisable interest, an interest upon which there can be an over-lapping consensus independently of a person’s comprehensive, religious or not, vision of the good. Reference to the ministerial exception to justify exempting employers from the disability antiretaliation laws is of doubtful compatibility with Emp’t Div., Dep’t. of Human Resources of Or. v. Smith. Courts can distinguish between a doctrinal and a nondoctrinal issue and abstain from controlling the first while controlling the legality of nondoctrinal issues. If the case of a qualified minister is at stake, whose substantive qualifications the courts cannot control under the First Amendment, then disability anti-discrimination law should be enforced, as it is neutral law of general applicability.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: First Amendment, Freedom of Religion, Ministerial Exception, Disability Discrimination, Employment Discrimination, Americans with Disabilities Act, Bona Fide Occupational Qualification, Rule of Law, Overlapping Consensus, Political Liberalism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 6, 2013 ; Last revised: November 10, 2013

Suggested Citation

Tourkochoriti, Ioanna, Revisiting Hosanna-Tabor v. E.E.O.C.: The Road Not Taken (October 1, 2013). Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 49, 2013, pp. 49-98. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2320934

Contact Information

Ioanna Tourkochoriti (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
125 Mt Auburn st, 3rd Floor
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
HOME PAGE: http://scholar.harvard.edu/tourkochoriti
Department of Law - Carleton University
Loeb Building 4th Floor Office D - 488
1125 Colonel By Drive
Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6
Canada
HOME PAGE: http://https://carleton-ca.academia.edu/IoannaTourkochoriti
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 325
Downloads: 80
Download Rank: 181,393

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.234 seconds