Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2321876
 


 



What is the Grotian Tradition in International Law?


John T. Parry


Lewis & Clark Law School

March 25, 2014

University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 35, Forthcoming
Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-23

Abstract:     
Recent scholarship in international law – for example, recent books by Mary Ellen O’Connell and Michael Scharf – relies on the idea of a “Grotian tradition” or of “Grotian moments” to provide normative foundations for significant parts of the contemporary international legal system. Despite the significant value of this scholarship, the underlying claim of a Grotian tradition is deeply flawed. The Grotian tradition itself was invented by mid-twentieth century scholars such as Hersch Lauterpacht to serve the goals of post-war liberal internationalism. There is no reason to believe that there is any more longstanding and normatively attractive tradition of engagement with the ideas of Hugo Grotius in international law and/or international relations. Indeed, many of the foundational ideas of Grotius’s own system of international law are deeply at odds with liberal or progressive approaches to contemporary international law.

“What Is the Grotian Tradition in International Law?” examines the claims made by and on behalf of the Grotian tradition and exposes the ways in which it fails to match up with the actual life and writings of Hugo Grotius. The article historicizes Grotius to demonstrate that much of his work – as propagandist, government official, attorney for the Dutch East India Company, and author of The Law of Prizes, The Free Sea, and The Rights of War and Peace – functioned to legitimate a violent and imperial conception of international law that served the interests of a simultaneously vulnerable and expansionist Dutch Republic. The result is not simply that the Grotian tradition is a fraud, or that Grotius is an inapt figure for any desirable conception of international law. Even more, a behind the scenes account of the Grotian tradition serves as a cautionary tale: international legal argument and international legal theory should reject the effort to claim deep historical foundations for the goals associated with liberal and progressive approaches to international law. A more self-conscious and critical stance holds out far better prospects of advancing those goals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 79

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 8, 2013 ; Last revised: April 30, 2014

Suggested Citation

Parry, John T., What is the Grotian Tradition in International Law? (March 25, 2014). University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol. 35, Forthcoming; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-23. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2321876

Contact Information

John T. Parry (Contact Author)
Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )
10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States
503-768-6888 (Phone)
503-768-6671 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 882
Downloads: 194
Download Rank: 92,347

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.344 seconds