Tulane Law School
November 27, 2013
Boston College Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2014, Forthcoming
Tulane Public Law Research Paper No. 13-16
When a debtor goes bankrupt and limited assets have to be divided between competing creditors, should unpaid taxes owed to the government be paid before the debts owed to other creditors? This Article defends the notion that some tax debts should be awarded priority. Insofar as bankruptcy protection transfers the risk of financial distress from a debtor to her creditors, the tax priority debate should be understood as a fight about how much debtor default risk the government should have to assume relative to other creditors. This Article argues that the government’s share of debtor default risk should be limited through the grant of tax priority because, contrary to the claims of priority’s critics, the government is constrained in its ability to diversify against such risk, via either substantive tax policy or changes in tax administration. Therefore, tax priority serves as an important structural limit on the government’s bankruptcy risk burden and safeguards the myriad important functions of government.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 64
Keywords: taxation, tax policy, tax priority, bankruptcy, reorganizations, social insurance
JEL Classification: H20, H21, H22, H23, H24, H25, H26, H29,H41, H42, K34, E62, G33, H55Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 10, 2013 ; Last revised: November 28, 2013
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds