Horne and the Normalization of Takings Litigation: A Response to Professor Echeverria
5 Pages Posted: 12 Sep 2013
Date Written: September 2013
Abstract
The last three Takings Clause decisions in the U.S. Supreme Court have shared a common theme. In each of them, the Court has cut through the morass of arbitrary, clause-specific rules, complications, and obstacles to relief that have accrued over the past few decades. I call this process “normalization” — treating Takings Clause claims as normal constitutional claims, subject to the same procedural, jurisdictional, and remedial principles that apply to other constitutional rights.
Keywords: Takings Clause, normalization, Echeverria, constitutional rights
JEL Classification: K10, K30, K40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
McConnell, Michael W., Horne and the Normalization of Takings Litigation: A Response to Professor Echeverria (September 2013). Environmental Law Reporter, Vol. 43, Sept. 2013, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2323818, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2323818
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.