Zooveillance: Foucault Goes To The Zoo
SUNY Buffalo Law School
Surveillance & Society 10(2): 119-133
SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-047
The last three decades have witnessed a dramatic shift in the governance of North American zoo animals. During this period, captive animal administration has transformed from a materially, geographically, and technologically limited enterprise - focused on the control of individual zoo animals within specific institutions - into an ambitious collective project that encompasses all accredited North American zoos and that governs more than a million zoo animals. Tapping into a sophisticated voluntary and collaborative self-monitored administration, zoos have been able to rely upon genetics and demography to achieve the ultimate goal of captive animal conservation. This essay frames this story of animal governance as surveillance. It identifies three layers that work interdependently to produce captive animal surveillance in North American zoos: elementary surveillance, which includes the naming, identifying, and recording of captive animals on the institutional level; dataveillance, or the global computerized management of animal populations; and collective reproductive control. What underlies these three modes of surveillance - framed here as "zooveillance" - are notions of care, stewardship, and conservation. Based on a series of sixty semistructured, in-depth interviews conducted with prominent zoo professionals in North America between May 2009 and April 2011 as well as observations of zoo operations and of professional meetings, this essay explores the relevancy and importance of applying the framework of surveillance in the nonhuman context of zoo animals.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16
Keywords: governance, animals, zoos, surveillance, zooveillance, Foucault, captivityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 11, 2013 ; Last revised: September 12, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds