Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2324380
 


 



The View From Below: Public Interest Lawyering, Social Change, and Adjudication


Douglas NeJaime


University of California, Irvine School of Law


61 UCLA Law Review Discourse 182 (2013)
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-136

Abstract:     
In Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective, Professors Alan Chen and Scott Cummings provide a nuanced and thorough account of the relationship between lawyering and social change. In this Review Essay, I explore how key insights from Chen and Cummings’ textbook could impact the way students approach adjudication, which remains the primary subject of instruction in law school classrooms. Continuing the marriage equality case study with which Chen and Cummings conclude, I analyze the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Hollingsworth v. Perry and United States v. Windsor through the lens of Public Interesting Lawyering. I argue that rather than understand the decisions as instances of top-down, court-ordered reform, students would locate the Court’s intervention within a bottom-up, dynamic process of legal and social change. As Public Interest Lawyering reveals — and as the Court’s approach in Perry and Windsor confirms — lawyers, litigants, and activists, rather than judges, drive that process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: September 12, 2013  

Suggested Citation

NeJaime, Douglas, The View From Below: Public Interest Lawyering, Social Change, and Adjudication. 61 UCLA Law Review Discourse 182 (2013); UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-136. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2324380

Contact Information

Douglas NeJaime (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
535A Administration
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 524
Downloads: 100
Download Rank: 162,855

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds