Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2325033
 


 



Death by Daubert: The Continued Attack on Private Antitrust


Christine P. Bartholomew


SUNY Buffalo Law School

August 15, 2013

Cardozo Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming
SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-002

Abstract:     
In 2011, with five words of dicta, the Supreme Court opened Pandora’s box for private antitrust enforcement. By suggesting trial courts must evaluate the admissibility of expert testimony at class certification, the Court placed a significant obstacle in the path of antitrust class actions. Following the Supreme Court’s lead, most courts now permit parties to bring expert challenges far earlier than the traditional summary judgment or pretrial timing. Premature rejection of expert testimony dooms budding private antitrust suits — cases that play an essential role in modern antitrust enforcement. The dangers for private antitrust plaintiffs are compounded by the Court’s opaque pronouncements on how to assess expert testimony. Confusion over how to evaluate antitrust economic experts, both substantively and procedurally, allows courts to use their gate-keeping power to undermine private antitrust enforcement.

Despite a large body of scholarship on Daubert (the test for expert admissibility), little has been written on its unique intersection with antitrust class actions. This Article fills that void by exploring how Daubert analysis at class certification hamstrings antitrust enforcement. The Article begins by discussing how judicial evaluation of expert testimony has evolved, with a particular eye to how courts address antitrust economic expert testimony at class certification. It then explains why this new barrier potentially places an impassible, unjustified roadblock in private antitrust enforcement’s path.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: Daubert, antitrust, evidence, class actions, judicial gate-keeping, experts

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 13, 2013 ; Last revised: November 6, 2013

Suggested Citation

Bartholomew, Christine P., Death by Daubert: The Continued Attack on Private Antitrust (August 15, 2013). Cardozo Law Review, 2014, Forthcoming; SUNY Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014-002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2325033

Contact Information

Christine P. Bartholomew (Contact Author)
SUNY Buffalo Law School ( email )
School of Law
528 O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260-1100
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 208
Downloads: 47
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Institutional Advantage in Competition and Innovation Policy
By Herbert Hovenkamp

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds