Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2325158
 


 



Restoring Equity in Right to Work


Catherine Fisk


University of California, Irvine School of Law

Benjamin I. Sachs


Harvard Law School

September 12, 2013

UC Irvine Law Review, Vol.4, No.1, 2014, Forthcoming
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-137

Abstract:     
Under United States labor law, when a majority of employees in a bargaining unit chooses union representation, all employees in the unit are represented by the union. Federal law, moreover, requires the union to represent all workers in a bargaining unit equally with respect to both collective bargaining and disciplinary matters. As a general rule, federal law enables unions to require employees to pay for the services that unions are obligated to provide them. Twenty-four states, however, have enacted laws granting union-represented employees the right to refuse to pay the union for the services that federal law requires the union to offer. As such, the intersection of federal labor law and state right to work laws results in a mandate that unions provide services for free to any employee who declines to pay dues.

This paper proposes three approaches to addressing this feature of U.S. labor law. First, the paper argues that under a proper reading of the NLRA states may not prohibit all mandatory payments from workers to unions. In particular, the paper shows that states must permit collective bargaining agreements requiring so-called objectors (or nonmembers) to pay dues and fees lower than those required of members. Second, the paper argues that in right to work states federal law ought to relax the requirement of exclusive representation and allow unions to organize, bargain on behalf of, and represent only those workers who affirmatively choose to become members. This proposal would implement a members-only bargaining regime in right to work states. Third, the paper contends that the NLRB ought to abandon its rule forbidding unions from charging objecting nonmembers a fee for representation services that the union provides directly and individually to them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 14, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Fisk, Catherine and Sachs, Benjamin I., Restoring Equity in Right to Work (September 12, 2013). UC Irvine Law Review, Vol.4, No.1, 2014, Forthcoming; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2013-137. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2325158

Contact Information

Catherine L. Fisk (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
4800 Berkeley Place
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949-824-3349 (Phone)
Benjamin I. Sachs
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 660
Downloads: 220
Download Rank: 79,426
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Unbundled Union: Politics Without Collective Bargaining
By Benjamin Sachs

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.610 seconds